Soul Murder
Dissociative identity disorder is a contemporary label for a long-standing and well-documented phenomena. Despite not explicitly calling it by name, experiences with what could be labeled as DID today—detachment and compartmentalization—are readily documented in this book. Soul Murder captures dissociative experiences well without being influenced by the modern-day cultural lens.
Dissociative identity disorder is a contemporary label for a long-standing and well-documented phenomena. Despite not explicitly calling it by name, experiences with what could be labeled as DID today—detachment and compartmentalization—are readily documented in Leonard Shengold’s Soul Murder. Shengold was a psychoanalyst who was well known for his work on child abuse. This book can be a difficult read, both because it explicitly discusses trauma and because Shengold’s psychoanalytic takes are off-putting to me, but I believe it captures dissociative experiences well without being tainted by the modern-day cultural lens.
The book is heavily Freud-focused and references George Orwell (and his book 1984) extensively. I list some relevant quotes below:
Soul murder is neither a diagnosis nor a condition. It is a dramatic term for circumstances that eventuate in crime—the deliberate attempt to eradicate or compromise the separate identity of another person.
The child’s mind is split into contradictory fragments to separate the bad from the good… the establishment of isolated divisions of the mind in which contradictory images of the self and of the parents are never permitted to coalesce. This compartmentalized “vertical splitting” transcends diagnostic categories. Feeling and thinking are compromised; registration of what has happened and what is happening is divided into “compartments” and therefore is inadequate.
The child [has] contradictory mental splits, or fragments of impulse and identity—reflecting the confusion between victim and tormentor, good and bad
Need enforced the preservation in the child’s mind of a delusional place in which the father must be good and right, the boy bad and wrong. Yet some registration that the father was bad was made somewhere, as it were in an other compartment (One patient said: “I am not a human being—I live in compartments."). These mental compartments are walled off and their contents cannot be blended; this is part of the defensive isolation brought about by brainwashing.
An example of what would be today called dissociative identity disorder is the case of “Patient D”. In addition to listing a lot of contradictory behavior the analyst observed1, the following conveys the experience of DID quite accurately:
A young man in analysis for several years complained of having difficulty with his memory and of disruptions in his thinking that interfered with his professional achievements. … So much was disavowed that his functioning sometimes suffered because of a discontinuity in his memory; this affected his sense of identity, and he had little awareness of himself as a child—only dim feelings about a little person with his name who seemed like everyone else. … D. described his childhood with few specific memories but generally thought of it as quite happy. During one session when he seemed to be integrating past and present more than was usual, he commented with poignancy, “It is sad. I am not really a whole person. I live in compartments, in fragments”.
The not knowing is accomplished by massive isolation, transient ego splits (“She is naughty, I am good,” said one nonpsychotic patient about herself), and chronic autohypnotic states. Frequently a combination of these is present, with a resultant (partial) impairment of intellectual functioning that remains in part instinctualized (Keiser 1962). The brainwashing that creates denial implies a compromised identity.
Despite being difficult to read, I’d recommend this book to anyone interested in a psychoanalytic take on the underlying phenomena of what would be labeled as “dissociative identity disorder” in modern times. Because it doesn’t use specific “DID language”, it presents phenomena and experiences in a way that’s not seen in other DID-specific texts.
-
Most of which is too graphic for me to want to put on this page, so you’ll have to read the book if you want to know more. ↩︎