Here, I list articles about dissociative disorders in the academic literature that I find interesting. This page is a work in progress and is updated periodically.
As an academic myself, I believe that it is important acknowledge that academia is inherently political, even though it’s not often presented as such. Even papers that make it through peer review often include bias and findings subject to interpretation, especially in softer sciences like psychology. Many dissociative experiences cannot be validated by traditional scientific techniques, thus leading to further division in the field about how to understand dissociation. This is, of course, one of the reasons why DID is considered to be a controversial diagnosis. The papers on this page are ones I’ve found interesting, but are not necessarily ones I fully agree with.
